Development of yogurt technology based on a mixture of cow’s and millet milk
https://doi.org/10.48184/2304-568X-2025-3-121-128
Abstract
In the last decade, plant-based alternatives to dairy products have gained increasing popularity due to their hypoallergenic properties, nutritional value, and sustainable production. Among these alternatives, millet stands out as a cereal rich in carbohydrates, minerals, and B vitamins. However, its limited protein content and essential amino acids reduce its nutritional value, necessitating technological adjustments. This study examines the production process of yogurt based on a mixture of 60% cow’s milk and 40% millet milk. The stages of millet milk production, its chemical composition, the impact of fermentation on nutritional value, and the analysis of physicochemical and organoleptic properties of the final product are considered. The results show that yogurt with 40% millet milk retains traditional flavor characteristics while significantly improving its nutritional profile. Specifically, the protein content increases to 3.31%, carbohydrates to 6.58%, and titratable acidity reaches 90°T. A moderate increase in viscosity (up to 5.80 mPa·s) and enhanced probiotic activity indicate high product stability. It was found that 40% millet milk is the optimal substitution level for cow’s milk, as higher concentrations negatively affect texture and organoleptic properties.
About the Authors
A. B. TapalovaKazakhstan
Astana, Zhenis Ave., 62
T. Ch. Tultabayeva
Kazakhstan
Astana, Zhenis Ave., 62
Zh. K. Imangaliyeva
Kazakhstan
050012, Almaty, Tole Bi St., 100
A. Dosumbayeva
Kazakhstan
050012, Almaty, Tole Bi St., 100
References
1. Makinen, O. E., Wanhalinna, V., Zannini, E., and Arendt, E. K. (2016). Foods for special dietary needs: Non- dairy plant-based milk substitutes and fermented dairy-type products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.761950
2. Zhang, Z., Shi, L., Pang, X., Wang, S., and Qiao, L. (2007). Evaluation of the phytochemical content, antioxidant activity and nutrition value of different species of millet. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55(21), 8752– 8757. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf071499p
3. Hou, J. W., Chen, L. J., and Chou, C. C. (2000). Changes in some components of soymilk during fermentation with bifidobacteria. Food Research International, 33(5), 393– 397.
4. Jeske, S., Zannini, E., and Arendt, E. K. (2017). Past, present and future: The strength of plant-based dairy substitutes based on gluten-free raw materials. Food Research International, 92, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.12.014
5. Rekha, C. R., and Vijayalakshmi, G. (2010). Influence of processing parameters on the quality of probiotic soy-based fermented food. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47(4), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0064-z
6. Makangali K.K., Tultabaeva T.CH., ZHakupova G.N., Saғandyқ A.T., Ahmetzhanova A.T., Beksultan A.A. (2024). Issledovanie vliyaniya BAD Bio-ap-irga na sostav i svojstva jogurtov. Vestnik Almatinskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 144(2), https://doi.org/10.48184/2304-568X-2024-2-96-10396–103.
7. Smid, E. J., and Lacroix, C. (2013). Microbe– microbe interactions in mixed culture food fermentations. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 24(2), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2012.11.007
8. Sethi, S., Tyagi, S. K., and Anurag, R. K. (2016). Plant-based milk alternatives: An emerging segment of functional beverages. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(9), 3408–3423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2328-3
9. GOST 31449-2013. Syroe korov'e moloko. Tekhnicheskie usloviya. Astana: Standartinform, 2013.
10. GOST 34398-2018. Molochnye molokosoderzhashchie produkty. Pravila termicheskoj i obrabotki. Astana: Standartinform, 2018.
11. National Research Council. (1992). Applications of Biotechnology to Traditional Fermented Foods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/1939
12. Tapalova, A.B., Tultabaeva, T.CH., Imangalieva, ZH.K., Өmіrzaқ, E.Ғ. (2024). Өsіmdіk zhәne siyr sүtіnіңқosyndysynan zhasalғan jogurttardyң biologiyalyққұndylyғyn baғalau. M.H. Dulati atyndaғy Taraz өңіrlіk universitetіnің habarshysy. Mekhanika zhәne tekhnologiyalar seriyasy, 2(86), 149–155.
13. Daniyarova, G. M. (2015). Sravnitel'naya ocenka organolepticheskih i fiziko-himicheskih pokazatelej jogurta iz koz'ego i korov'ego moloka. Molodoj uchenyj, № 63, S. 29–33.
14. Temerbaeva, M. V., Temerbaeva, A. A. (2016). Razrabotka biogurta na osnove koz'ego moloka dlya shkol'nogo pitaniya. V kn.: XVI Satpaevskie chteniya: Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. molodyh uchenyh, magistrantov, studentov i shkol'nikov, Pavlodar, Tom 7, S. 377–379.
15. Gorbatova, K.K. (2018). Biohimiya moloka i molochnyh produktov: Uchebnik dlya SPO. Moskva: Giord. 220 s.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Tapalova A.B., Tultabayeva T.Ch., Imangaliyeva Zh.K., Dosumbayeva A. Development of yogurt technology based on a mixture of cow’s and millet milk. The Journal of Almaty Technological University. 2025;149(3):121-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48184/2304-568X-2025-3-121-128