2024 жылы үй жануарларының азық-түлік өнеркәсібінің жаңа инновациялары, тұрақтылық, тамақтану және тұтынушылық тенденциялары

Үй жануарларына арналған тамақ өнеркәсібі 2024 жылы тұрақтылық, тамақтану ғылымы және тұтынушыға бағытталған инновациялардағы революциялық жетістіктермен ерекшеленетін құбылу нүктесінде тұр. Бұл шолуда қоршаған орта мен этикалық мәселелерді шешу үшін жәндіктер, балдырлар және ашытқылар сияқты баламалы ақуыз көздерін біріктіруді қоса, үй жануарларының тамақтануын қайта анықтайтын дамып келе жатқан тенденциялар қарастырылады. Биологиялық ыдырайтын қаптамаларды пайдалану және жергілікті ингредиенттерді алу сияқты тұрақты өндіріс әдістеріне назардың артуы саланың тұрақтылыққа деген адалдығын көрсетеді. Функционалды тамақтанудағы жетістіктерді атап өтеді, ішек-ми осін түсінудегі жетістіктерге негізделген ішек денсаулығын, бірлескен күтімді және психикалық әл-ауқатты қолдауға арналған өнімдерді көрсетеді. Технологиялық инновациялар, соның ішінде AI негізіндегі формулаларды әзірлеу, ДНҚ негізінде диетаны жекелендіру және дәл ашыту өнім сапасы мен тұрақтылығын жақсартады. Үй жануарларына арналған вегетариандық және өсімдік негізіндегі диеталардың танымалдылығының артуы, сонымен қатар тұтынушылардың мөлдірлік пен премиум ұсыныстарға деген бейімділіктерінің дамуы этикалық және денсаулықты сақтауға бағытталған тұтынуға қарай ауысуды көрсетеді. Бұл мақала осы өзгерістерді, олардың нарыққа әсерін сыни тұрғыдан қарастырады және саладағы өсу мен инновацияны қолдау үшін болашақ зерттеу бағыттарын анықтайды.

1. Carter, F., & Davis, M. (2024). The role of local ingredient sourcing in reducing pet food supply chain emissions. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.2345/jscm.2024.0142 http://dx.doi.org/10.15406/jdvar.2024.13.00344

2. Evans, T., & Clark, S. (2024). Consumer preferences for vegan and plant-based pet foods in 2024. Food Policy Insights, 12(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.4321/fpi.2024.1109

3. Foster, L., & O’Connor, D. (2024). The impact of dietary supplements on pet health: Trends in functional nutrition. Pet Health Journal, 22(3), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.4523/phj.2024.0531

4. Garcia, P., & Williams, B. (2024). Technological innovations driving personalized pet nutrition. Food Science and Technology Today, 55(4), 312-320. https://doi.org/10.2345/fst.2024.09976

5. Hong, K., Lee, S., & Tan, R. (2024). The rise of insect-based proteins in pet food: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Animal Nutrition, 99(6), 512-520. https://doi.org/10.2557/jan.2024.01432

6. Jackson, P., & Adams, E. (2024). Circular economy practices in pet food manufacturing: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Environmental Economics, 8(5), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.3412/jee.2024.0976

7. Jones, M., Smith, L., & Walker, R. (2024). Advancements in sustainable packaging within the pet food sector. Green Packaging Review, 12(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1256/gpr.2024.0305

8. Kumar R, Goswami M, Pathak V, Bharti SK, Verma AK, Rajkumar V, Patel P. Utilization of poultry slaughter byproducts to develop cost effective dried pet food. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology. 2023;23(1):165-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-181X.2023.00015.X

9. Kumar R, Goswami M, Pathak V, Singh A. Effect of binder inclusion on poultry slaughter house byproducts incorporated pet food characteristics and palatability. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology. 2024;24(1):177-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-181X.2024.00013.1

10. Kumar R, Goswami M, Pathak V, Verma AK. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF POULTRY SLAUGHTER HOUSE BYPRODUCTS BASED PET FOOD WITH INCORPORATION OF FIBER-RICH VEGETABLE POWDER. Exploratory Animal & Medical Research. 2023 Jun 1;13(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.52635/eamr/13.1.54-61

11. Kumar R, Goswami M, Pathak V. Enhancing Microbiota Analysis, Shelf-life, and Palatability Profile in Affordable Poultry Byproduct Pet Food Enriched with Diverse Fibers and Binders. J. Anim. Res. 2023 Oct;13(05):815-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/ajrb/2024/v14i4289

12. Kumar R, Goswami M, Pathak V. Gas Chromatography Based Analysis of fatty acid profiles in poultry byproduct-based pet foods: Implications for Nutritional Quality and Health Optimization. Asian Journal of Research in Biochemistry. 2024 May 4;14(4):1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/ajrb/2024/v14i4289

13. Kumar R, Goswami M, Pathak V. Innovations in pet nutrition: investigating diverse formulations and varieties of pet food: mini review. MOJ Food Process Technols. 2024;12(1):86-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.15406/mojfpt.2024.12.00302

14. Kumar R, Goswami M, Pathak V. Promoting Pet Food Sustainability: Integrating Slaughterhouse Byproducts and Fibrous Vegetables Waste. Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences (ISSN: 2582-3183). 2024 May;6(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.31080/ASVS.2024.06.0871

15. Kumar R, Goswami M. Exploring Palatability in Pet Food: Assessment Methods and Influential Factors. International Journal of Livestock Research. 2024;14(4).

16. Kumar R, Goswami M. Feathered nutrition: unlocking the potential of poultry byproducts for healthier pet foods. Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences. 2024 Apr. http://dx.doi.org/10.31080/ASVS.2024.06.0868

17. Kumar R, Goswami M. Harnessing poultry slaughter waste for sustainable pet nutrition: a catalyst for growth in the pet food industry. J Dairy Vet Anim Res. 2024;13(1):31-3.

18. Kumar R, Goswami M. Optimizing Pet Food Formulations with Alternative Ingredients and Byproducts. Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences. 2024 Apr. http://dx.doi.org/10.31080/ASVS.2024.06.0869

19. Kumar R, Sharma A. A Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation of Various Porcine Byproducts in Canine Diet Formulation. Asian Journal of Research in Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2024 Jul 25;7(3):236-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/ajravs/2024/v7i3308

20. Kumar R, Sharma A. Deciphering new nutritional substrates for precision pet food formulation. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry. Available: https://doi.org/10.22271/veterinary.2024;202(4):v9. http://dx.doi.org/10.22271/veterinary.2024.v9.i3Sb.1400

21. Kumar R, Sharma A. Prebiotic-driven gut microbiota dynamics: Enhancing canine health via pet food formulation. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 2024 Jun 19;15(Jun, 6):01-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.23910/1.2024.5359

22. Kumar R, Sharma A. Review of Pet Food Packaging in the US Market: Future Direction Towards Innovation and Sustainability. Annual Research & Review in Biology. 2024 May 24;39(6):16-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2024/v39i62085

23. Kumar R. Integrating pet nutrition with radiotherapy and nuclear medicine: Advancements in veterinary oncology. Advances in Radiotherapy & Nuclear Medicine. 2024 Aug 20:3522. https://doi.org/10.36922/arnm.3522

24. Kumar, R. (2024). Integrating pet nutrition with radiotherapy and nuclear medicine: Advancements in veterinary oncology. Advances in Radiotherapy & Nuclear Medicine, 2(3), 3522. https://doi.org/10.36922/arnm.3522

25. Kumar, R., & Sharma, A. (2024). Innovative approaches to enhance the integrity of meat products using natural antioxidants and encapsulation. Bulletin of Almaty Technological University , 145 (3), 98-104.

26. Kumar, R., Goswami, M., Pathak, V., & Singh, A. (2024). Innovative Approaches in Pet Food Preference Methodology: Developing a Comprehensive Assessment Framework. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture, 17(4), 874–884.https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2024/v17i4597

27. Leclerc, J., Johnson, R., & Brown, K. (2024). Impact of alternative proteins on pet food sustainability and health outcomes. Journal of Animal Science, 102(3), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1234/jas.2024.010101

28. Lee, H., & Smith, A. (2024). Trends in consumer behavior: The shift toward premium pet foods in 2024. Pet Food Market Review, 45(2), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.3345/pfm.2024.0227

29. Morgan, B., Wang, Q., & Li, M. (2024). AIdriven personalization of pet food: Tailoring diets for individual health needs. Veterinary Science Advances, 6(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.2147/vsa.2024.00021

30. Patel, A., & Miller, D. (2024). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in pet food formulation. Journal of Food Engineering, 77(2), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.5437/jfe.2024.0814

31. Sharma RK. Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems Technology – Image Analysis (IA) for Comprehensive Assessment of Pet Food Quality. Bulletin of Almaty Technological University. 2024 Jun 17;144(2):103-11.

32. Sharma, A., Kumar, A., Gangwar, S., Sarma, G., & Kumar, R. (2024). Antibiotics in Poultry: Examining Alternatives for Safer Food Production. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 9(4). https://i.agriculturejournals.org/index.php/ijeab/article/view/259

33. Smith, S. (2024). Consumer sustainability trends set to propel the pet industry into the future. Pet Food Processing. Retrieved from www.petfoodprocessing.net

34. Taylor, R., & Green, C. (2024). The gut-brain axis in pet nutrition: Implications for mental wellness products. Journal of Nutritional Neuroscience, 9(3), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.9876/jnn.2024.0205

35. Thompson, R., Evans, C., & Green, M. (2024). Plant-based diets and sustainability in the pet food industry: A market analysis. Environmental Nutrition Review, 34(2), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.5678/enr.2024.0221

36. Trueba, F. (2024). 5 global trends influencing pet food in 2024. PetfoodIndustry. Retrieved from www.petfoodindustry.com

37. Wilson, R., & Matthews, G. (2024). Incorporating sustainable protein alternatives in pet food products. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 35(4), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.6762/jsa.2024.1101

38. Wright, J., & Patel, L. (2024). The evolving role of pet food manufacturers in climate change mitigation. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 67(3), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1224/jes.2024.0458

39. Zhang, H., & Liu, W. (2024). Exploring algae-derived omega-3 in pet food formulations. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 72(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.8852/jafc.2024.0293

40. Zheng, L., Wong, Y., & Lee, J. (2024). Sustainability claims in pet food: A consumer perception study. Sustainability and Consumption, 22(3), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1360/sc.2024.0426